Numbers
Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy Joshua Judges Ruth 1st Samuel 2nd Samuel 1st Kings 2nd Kings 1st Chronicles 2nd Chronicles Ezra Nehemiah Esther Job Psalms Proverbs Ecclesiastes Song Of Songs Isaiah Jeremiah Lamentations Ezekiel Daniel Hosea Joel Amos Obadiah Jonah Micah Nahum Habakkuk Zephaniah Haggai Zechariah Malachi Matthew Mark Luke John Acts Romans 1st Corinthians 2nd Corinthians Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians 1st Thessalonians 2nd Thessalonians 1st Timothy 2nd Timothy Titus Philemon Hebrews James 1st Peter 2nd Peter 1st John 2nd John 3rd John Jude Revelation

Numbers Chapter 13 verse 4 Holy Bible

ASV Numbers 13:4

And these were their names: Of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.
read chapter 13 in ASV

BBE Numbers 13:4

And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua, the son of Zaccur.
read chapter 13 in BBE

DARBY Numbers 13:4

And these are their names: for the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur;
read chapter 13 in DARBY

KJV Numbers 13:4

And these were their names: of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.
read chapter 13 in KJV

WBT Numbers 13:4

And these were their names: Of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.
read chapter 13 in WBT

WEB Numbers 13:4

These were their names: Of the tribe of Reuben, Shammua the son of Zaccur.
read chapter 13 in WEB

YLT Numbers 13:4

and these their names: For the tribe of Reuben, Shammua son of Zaccur.
read chapter 13 in YLT

Pulpit Commentary

Pulpit CommentaryVerse 4. - These were their names. None of these names occur elsewhere, except those of Caleb and Joshua. The order of the tribes is the same as in ch. 1, except that Zebulun is separated from the other sons of Leah, and placed after Benjamin, while the two sons of Joseph are separated from one another. In verse 11 "the tribe of Joseph" is explained to be "the tribe of Manasseh;" elsewhere it is either common to both, or confined to Ephraim (see Revelation 7:8, and cf. Ezekiel 37:16). No spy was sent for the tribe of Levi, because it was now understood to have no territorial claims upon the land of promise, and to stand altogether by itself in relation to the national hopes and duties.

Ellicott's Commentary