Genesis Chapter 19 verse 33 Holy Bible

ASV Genesis 19:33

And they made their father drink wine that night: and the first-born went in, and lay with her father; and he knew not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
read chapter 19 in ASV

BBE Genesis 19:33

And that night they made their father take much wine; and the older daughter went into his bed; and he had no knowledge of when she went in or when she went away.
read chapter 19 in BBE

DARBY Genesis 19:33

And they gave their father wine to drink that night. And the first-born went in, and lay with her father, and he did not know of her lying down, nor of her rising.
read chapter 19 in DARBY

KJV Genesis 19:33

And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
read chapter 19 in KJV

WBT Genesis 19:33

And they made their father drink wine that night: and the first-born went in and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.
read chapter 19 in WBT

WEB Genesis 19:33

They made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father. He didn't know when she lay down, nor when she arose.
read chapter 19 in WEB

YLT Genesis 19:33

And they cause their father to drink wine on that night; and the first-born goeth in, and lieth with her father, and he hath not known in her lying down, or in her rising up.
read chapter 19 in YLT

Pulpit Commentary

Pulpit CommentaryVerse 33. - And they made their father drink wine that night - which was sinful both in them and him (vide Isaiah 5:11; Proverbs 20:1; Habakkuk 2:15) - and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose. That it was his own daughter quacum concumberet (Rosenmüller), being so intoxicated that he could not discern who it was to whom he had approached, or even what he was doing (Keil). The reading, "when he lay down and when he arose (LXX.) is incorrect, and the explanations that Lot was a mere unconscious instrument in this disgraceful transaction (Kalisch), that he was-entirely ignorant of all that had taken place (Chrysostom, Cajetan), that he was struck on account of his intemperance with a spirit of stupor (Calvin), are not warranted by the text.

Ellicott's Commentary