1st Kings Chapter 6 verse 34 Holy Bible

ASV 1stKings 6:34

and two doors of fir-wood: the two leaves of the one door were folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding.
read chapter 6 in ASV

BBE 1stKings 6:34

And two folding doors of cypress-wood, with two leaves.
read chapter 6 in BBE

DARBY 1stKings 6:34

And the two folding-doors were of cypress-wood: the two leaves of the one door were folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding.
read chapter 6 in DARBY

KJV 1stKings 6:34

And the two doors were of fir tree: the two leaves of the one door were folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding.
read chapter 6 in KJV

WBT 1stKings 6:34

And the two doors were of fir tree: the two leaves of the one door were folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding.
read chapter 6 in WBT

WEB 1stKings 6:34

and two doors of fir-wood: the two leaves of the one door were folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding.
read chapter 6 in WEB

YLT 1stKings 6:34

And the two doors `are' of fir-tree, the two sides of the one door are revolving, and the two hangings of the second door are revolving.
read chapter 6 in YLT

Pulpit Commentary

Pulpit CommentaryVerse 34. - And the two doors were [As in ver. 32, the verb is to be supplied from the verse preceding. And he made two doors, etc.] of fir tree [בְּרוש see note on 1 Kings 5:8]: the two leaves [lit. ribs, same word as in vers. 5, 8, 10] of the one door were folding [Heb. rolling], and the two leaves [קְלָעִים is probably - a clerical error for צְלָעִים arising out of the קָלַע, in vers. 32, 35] of the other [Heb. second] door were folding. [It seems more natural to suppose that the leaves were formed by a vertical than by a horizontal division. Indeed, it is doubtful whether the word גָּלִיל would be applied the latter arrangement. Keil objects to the former on the ground that the leaves would thus be only one cubit broad each, and the opening of one leaf, consequently, would be insufficient to admit of any person's passing through. But to this it may be replied (1) that the opening of two leaves would in any case form a sufficiently wide entrance, and (2) that it is not said that all the leaves were of uniform width. Besides, the other arrangement is without precedent in the public buildings of the East.]

Ellicott's Commentary