1st Chronicles Chapter 21 verse 6 Holy Bible

ASV 1stChronicles 21:6

But Levi and Benjamin counted he not among them; for the king's word was abominable to Joab.
read chapter 21 in ASV

BBE 1stChronicles 21:6

But Levi and Benjamin were not numbered among them, for Joab was disgusted with the king's order.
read chapter 21 in BBE

DARBY 1stChronicles 21:6

But Levi and Benjamin he did not count among them; for the king's word was abominable to Joab.
read chapter 21 in DARBY

KJV 1stChronicles 21:6

But Levi and Benjamin counted he not among them: for the king's word was abominable to Joab.
read chapter 21 in KJV

WBT 1stChronicles 21:6

But Levi and Benjamin he counted not among them: for the king's word was abominable to Joab.
read chapter 21 in WBT

WEB 1stChronicles 21:6

But he didn't count Levi and Benjamin among them; for the king's word was abominable to Joab.
read chapter 21 in WEB

YLT 1stChronicles 21:6

And Levi and Benjamin he hath not numbered in their midst, for the word of the king was abominable with Joab.
read chapter 21 in YLT

Pulpit Commentary

Pulpit CommentaryVerse 6. - Averse to his task as Joab was, he may have been indebted to the memory of the exemption of Levi from census for the idea of enlarging upon it and omitting Benjamin as well. The important contents of this short verse are not found in Samuel, so that we can borrow no light thence. But Benjamin was "the least of the tribes" (Judges 21:1-23), and Peele has suggested that God would not permit the numbers of either of these tribes to be lessened, as he foresaw that they would be faithful to the throne of David on the division of the kingdom. Others think that the omission of these tribes in the census may have been due to Joab's recall to Jerusalem before the completion of the work, and to the king's repentance in the interim cutting off the necessity of completing it. This little agrees, however, with the resolute tone and assigned reason contained in this verse. Peele's explanation, meantime, explains nothing in respect of the statement that the king's word was abominable to Joab.

Ellicott's Commentary

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(6) But Levi . . .--This verse is wanting in Samuel, but it probably existed in the original source. There is nothing in the style to suggest a later hand; while the word "counted" (p?qad), which has not been used before in this chapter, occurs twice in the parallel passage (2Samuel 24:2; 2Samuel 24:4). It is noticeable also that the chronicler writes "the king" (not "David") here, as in Samuel.As regards the fact stated, we may observe that the sacerdotal tribe of Levi would naturally be exempted from a census taken for military or political purposes. (Comp. Numbers 1:47; Numbers 1:49.) And 1Chronicles 27:24 expressly asserts that the census was not completed; a result with which Joab's disapprobation of the scheme may have had much to do. The order in which the tribes were numbered (2Samuel 24:4-8; see 1Chronicles 21:4) makes it likely that Judah and Benjamin were to have been taken last, and that, after numbering Judah, Joab repaired to the capital, where he was ordered by the king to desist from the undertaking. Josephus (Antiq. vii. 13, 1) speaks as if Joab had not had time to include Benjamin in the census. He may have feared to give offence to the tribe of Saul. . . .