Acts Chapter 9 verse 7 Holy Bible
And the men that journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing the voice, but beholding no man.
read chapter 9 in ASV
And the men who were with him were not able to say anything; hearing the voice, but seeing no one.
read chapter 9 in BBE
But the men who were travelling with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but beholding no one.
read chapter 9 in DARBY
And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.
read chapter 9 in KJV
read chapter 9 in WBT
The men who traveled with him stood speechless, hearing the sound, but seeing no one.
read chapter 9 in WEB
And the men who are journeying with him stood speechless, hearing indeed the voice but seeing no one,
read chapter 9 in YLT
Pulpit Commentary
Pulpit CommentaryVerse 7. - That journeyed for which journeyed, A.V. ; the voice for a voice, A.V. ; beholding for seeing, A.V. Speechless; ἐννεοί (or rather ἐνεοί) is found nowhere else in the New Testament, but is not uncommon in the LXX. (e.g. Isaiah 56:10) and in classical Greek. Here it means speechless from terror, struck dumb. The description here given by St. Luke seems to be contradictory in two particulars to St. Paul's own account in Acts 22:9 and Acts 26:14. For St. Paul's companions are said here to have "stood speechless;" but in Acts 26:14 they were "all fallen to the earth." Here they "hear the voice," but in Acts 22:9 they "heard not the voice of him that spake." It is obvious, however, that in such descriptions all depends upon the particular moment of the transaction described which happens to be uppermost in the mind of the speaker or writer at the time, and the particular purpose in relation to which he is giving the description. Thus at one moment the spectators might be standing dumfounded, and at the next they might be prostrate on the ground, or vice versa. Either description of their attitude would be a true one, though not true with regard to the same moment. Again, if the purpose of the speaker was to affirm that the whole company were conscious of both the vision and the sound of a voice speaking, but that only Saul saw the Divine Speaker, the description "hearing the voice, but beholding no man" would be the natural one. Whereas, if the purpose was to express that Saul alone heard the words spoken to him by the Lord, the description of his companions," They saw indeed the light... but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me," would be equally natural.
Ellicott's Commentary
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(7) Hearing a voice, but seeing no man.--We are told by St. Paul himself (Acts 22:9) that they "did not hear the voice." What is meant is clearly that they did not hear the words--could attach no meaning to the sounds which for Saul himself had so profound a significance. So, in like manner, they saw the light, but did not see the form. In Acts 26:14, they also are said to have fallen on the ground in terror.
